~
111 lIldj~l~
Thepopulation issue has mostly been perceived as a
demographic or numerical concern of the elites rather
than as a genuine concern of the individual or the
responsible to meet these needs in an equitable manner. Such
a style of governance brought in quick results in all indicators
of social development including women's status; and the
family - particularly among the poor and the marginalized The : firtility rate came down very sharply by 1970s. Only with the
perceived needs and concerns of the vast multitudes of the lower
contagion of western education, the threat perception of
middle class, the poor and the marginalized sections have not
growing numbers took deep roots in the mindset of some
been realistically assessedand reflected in most of the policies,
Chinese scholars, and leaders, and they advocated many
strategies and programmes of governments and in the style of their
restrictive population policies like the "one-child policy" which
implementation directed towards tackling the issue of population. • appears to have created more societal and family problems like
A balanced non-judgemental two-way linkage between
skewed sex ratio, fimale infimticide and fOeticide, rather than
population stabilization and sustainable development laced
helping in smooth stabilization of population. There are thus
with cross-cutting perspectives of human rights and dignity as • lessons to be learnt jom the Chinese experience in governance.
well as gender equality, equity and justice, constituted the
we tend to misrepresent the Chinese story, whenever we compare
basic perception of Mahatma Gandhi, when he countered the • the Indian situation fOr advocating coercive policies like "two-
arguments of the exponents of international birth control
child norm" and the concomitment regime of incentives and
movement trying to make India an arena fOr their
disincentives to solve our population problem quickly.
experimentation in the 1920s and '30s. While stating that
The governance fOr implementing the strategies and
"uncontrolled reproduction was a social problem" and that
programmes/Action plan of the National Population Policy need
"Jndians should have smaller but healthier families';
to be suffUsed with a transfOrmation of the conventional mindset
Gandhiji advocated women's empowerment and gender
and style of fUnctioning of the bureaucrats, technocrats and
equality to enable women to take decisions on child bearing.
service providers vis-a-vis the approach to population issues,
He believed in "Gram Swara)" rule of the community, by the
accountability, planning, monitoring, and coordination and
community and fOr the community. The fundamentals of the
synergy - vertical as well as horizontal. Positioning family
paradigm shift in approach to the population and
planning in the wider canvas of Reproductive Health with a lift-
development problem in ICPD Programme of Action 1994
cycle approach and the overall arena of primary health care and
and the National Population Policy, 2000, are in tune with
other key programmes of education, nutrition, water, sanitation,
the spirit of Gandhi's vision in respect of the population
employment and poverty alleviation (in fact, the entire gamut of
problem in India.
gender-sensitive, rights-based and equitable social development)
The fiar of "population bomb" and ''population explosion"
with a participatory community needs assessment periodically
was unleashed on "the same pedestal of anxieties as the
fOr every village and fOr every ward of a town should be the
nuclear war'; which engendered quickjix, short-cut and
starting point in any exercise of planning and designing of
dehumanized policy prescriptions, and "top-down targets" of • programme implementation. The authoritarian top-down
family planning bereft of the recognition of a two-way linkage
target settings and bureaucratic monitoring of targets need to
of population and development, and the primacy of women's
be replaced with work-plans based on CNA with the active
health and rights in the process.
participation of PRls, urban local bodies and community
The evolution of population stabilization effirts in India
based organizations like self-help groups, particularly of
by Government goes back to the onset of 5-year development
women. Such holistic plan fOr health, population and social
plans in 1951-52. A national programme was launched
development should be prepared fOr each of the 6,40,000
which emphasized "family planning" to the extent necessary
villages and each ward of 6000 urban areas. The district
fOr reducing birth rates to stabilize the population at a level
plans, state plans and the central plan should be based on the
consistent with the requirement of national economy. A
community level plans reflecting the perceived needs of each
Family Planning Research and Programme Committee,
family, and each community. Implementation of the work
constituted in Mumbai, in its first meeting in July 1953
plans fOr each community should be monitored by the elected
emphasized that the family planning programme should not
members of the ward of the panchayat/urban body with
be conceived of in the narrow sense of birth control.
technical assistance jom Government-NGOs-private sector,
Around the same period China took many benign measures
and all elements of 'social audit' built into this. "Quality of
of social development towards equitable access to basic health,
Care" indicators should be the most important ones to be
education, assets (including revolutionary re-distribution of land) • monitored rather than the quantitative targets per se. Only
and income over next 20 years. The concept of family planning
then could the effirts at population stabilization proceed on a
services that China fOllowed was in tune with what the Mumbai
smooth course, and could turn into a peoples' movement
Family Planning Research and Programme Committee had
• producing the desired results.
conceptualized Instead of a top-clown prescriptive target
approach, China went in fOr a localized community approach
and became more alert to the needs of the communities and were •
(Gist of the Convocation address given in International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai, and the article by Mr.
Nanda published in the Indian Journal of Public Administration, Special Issue, January-March, 2004.)