2013
Population Foundation of India
planning program, and the ASHA is now
charged with this responsibility. The main
difference is that in many instances there
are in practice (whatever the official
policy may be)‘targets’ for the community
health worker to fulfill. This transforms an
intervention that could improve quality
of family planning services by providing
information and services closer to the
woman’s home, into one with coercive
overtones. We need to reorient the role
of the female community health worker
and include male community health
workers. Their role would be to provide
information, facilitate discussion on the
pros and cons of different methods and
help clients make an informed choice of a
method that is acceptable to him/her.
Conclusions
Population Foundation of India
B-28 Qutab Institutional Area
New Delhi - 110 016
This review has identified a range of
‘promising’ strategies that would help
reposition family planning as a means of
upholding the health and rights of wom-
en, men and children. The results of the
review need to be interpreted keeping in
mind the very limited evidence on which
it is based. Many interventions have not
been documented, and those document-
ed here are yet to be rigorously evaluated.
One of the key tasks ahead is to system-
atically document and evaluate existing
interventions.
The review identifies strategies that are
worthy of further experimentation and
up-scaling from among the pool of inter-
ventions that have been implemented
thus far. However this should preclude
the possibility of innovating what has
not yet been tried. There are other po-
tential interventions that are as yet to
be tried or even conceived: for example,
programs that uphold reproductive and
sexual rights; programs that provide a
comprehensive range of reproductive
health services of which family planning is
an integral part. It is as much a priority to
design and implement interventions that
are out-of-the box, as it is to have rigorous
evaluations of what already exists.
Safe abortion services have featured
among the strategies examined only as a
part of interventions that integrate fam-
ily planning with post-abortion care. Yet,
any attempt to reposition family plan-
ning would need to include safe abor-
tion services as an important dimension
of upholding women’s health and rights.
We hope future reviews will examine ‘ef-
fective’ safe abortion services which have
the woman’s safety and wellbeing as out-
come indicators.
Last but not least, all strategies to ‘reposi-
tion family planning’ recommended above
are by definition guided by a human rights
perspective. If taken out of this context
and perspective, and superimposed with
a ‘population control’ imperative, we may
achieve fertility reduction, but without a
concomitant improvement in population
health and wellbeing.
References
1. Health Policy Project. Repositioning Family Planning. Available from:
http://www.healthpolicyproject.com/index.cfm?ID=topics-RepositionFP, ac-
cessed 2 February 2013.
2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Family Planning: Strategy Overview.
Global Health program, April 2012.
3. United Nations Population Fund. National Population Policy India 2000. New
Delhi, UNFPA, 2000. Chapter 1, Introduction.
4. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International
. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai:
IIPS, 2007. Available from: <http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FRIND3/
FRIND3-Vol1[Oct-17-2008].pdf>. Accessed January 15, 2013.
5. United Nations Population Fund. The New Generations, the Family and Soci-
ety. Population Issues 1999. Available from: <http://www.unfpa.org/6billion/
populationissues/generation.htm>, Accessed January 15, 2013.
6. Gupta S, Mukherjee S, Singh S, Pande R, Basu S. Knot Ready. Lessons from
India on delaying marriage for girls [Internet]. Delhi, International Center for
Research on Women; 2008. Available from: <http://www.icrw.org/files/pub-
lications/Knot-Ready-Lessons-from-India-on-Delaying-Marriage-for-Girls.
pdf>. Accessed January 16, 2013.
7. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation
on Birth Spacing. Geneva, WHO, 2006.
8. Koenig MA and Khan ME. Improving the quality of care in India’s
family planning programme. New Delhi, Population Council, 1999.
Chapter 1.
9. Sudharshan H. Role of NGOs in operationalising primary health care
services: Modalities for replication of Karnataka’s experience. Presen-
tation given at the Training Programme on Health, Rights and Women’s
Empowerment, organized by the MacArthur Foundation, 22-28 Sep-
tember, 2002, Bangalore.
10. Santhya KG and Jejeebhoy SJ. Young people’s sexual and reproductive
health in India: Policies, programmes and realities. South and East Asia Re-
gional Working Paper, New Delhi, Population Council, 2007, No. 19.
11. Santhya KG, Jejeebhoy SJ and Ghosh S. Addressing the Sexual and
Reproductive Health Needs of Young People: Perspectives and Experienc-
es of Stakeholders from the Health and Non-health Sectors, New Delhi,
Population Council, 2007.
8