3. Creation and training of village-level feedback
teams: Local feedback teams at the village level
were developed to create awareness and seek
independent feedback about the functioning of
HWCs and the issues patients were facing. The
feedback team for an HWC comprised three active
members from each VHSNC falling in the catchment
area of the HWC. ANMs and ASHAs selected
feedback team members from among the
community representatives that were part of
VHSNCs, including panchayat members, young
mother’s groups, farmer’s groups, etc. A total of
3,200 VHSNC members were selected and trained to
collect feedback about HWCs’ functioning, the costs
being incurred by patients to get treatment, identify
gaps and conduct discussions with HWC staff to
find solutions.
B. Field implementation
4. Monitoring of HWCs and collection of feedback: The
feedback teams, comprising trained VHSNC members,
went to HWCs on a bi-monthly basis to identify gaps
and get patient feedback. Information was collected
and recorded on feedback forms about whether staff
such as Community Health Officer (CHO) and
Multipurpose Health Worker (MPW, male and female)
were available; whether the intended health services,
diagnostic tests, drugs and other commodities were
being provided to people; and whether facilities such
as a clean waiting area, a usable toilet and drinking
water were available. Feedback was collected from
patients about the behaviour of health staff and the
out-of-pocket expenses being incurred. The feedback
teams also held preliminary informal discussions with
the CHO, ANMs and MPW on the identified gaps and
sought ways to plug these gaps.
5. Analysis of feedback and action plan to fill the gaps:
The feedback teams held a focus group discussion
with the CHO and the HWC staff to discuss the
findings. An action plan was put in place, including the
corrective action(s) required to fill the gap(s), the
person/body responsible for the action and the
timeline for action. Data from different feedback forms
was fed into Google forms for compilation and
analysis at the state level to identify and analyse
critical issues.
IMPACT
Based on feedback from the community, the state NHM
Mission Director issued instructions to Joint Directors
at the district level to act on the gaps the community
had identified. Among the gaps highlighted by the
community at several HWCs were: infrastructural
issues like lack of power back-up, seating
arrangements and drinking water facility; irregular
supply of medicines; vacant positions of health staff
and need for labour room equipment. Informed by such
feedback from the ground, the concerned district
authorities are taking actions to resolve issues and
improve the quality of health care at HWCs. The
illustration below shows two examples of how
feedback from the ground has led to corrective actions.
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK PROMPTS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: A FEW EXAMPLES
ISSUES
HIGHLIGHTED BY
THE COMMUNITY
Irregular supply of
essential drugs
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Letter issued by the Office of
the Joint Director of Health
Services, NHM, Goalpara
district, to drug management
personnel to ensure proper
flow of essential drugs to HWCs
Lack of power
back-up facility,
inadequate provisions
for waiting area and
drinking water supply
Office of the Joint Director
of Health Services, NHM,
Udalguri district, ensured
repair of the generator and
setting up of waiting area
and drinking water facilities