Cooperation in the Cause of E-nvirotnnent and DeDeloplnent
RaD/S Call at RiD Summit
The P~ime
Minister, Mr. r.v.
Narasimha Rao.l
made an impas-
sioned plea for inter-
national cooperation
to reverse the tide of
Earth's degradation
Prime Minister P.V. through environ-
Narasimha Rao
ment-friendly tech-
nologies while speak-
ing at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro
(Brazil) on June 12, 1992.
. Mr. Rao who had the honour of
being the first of the 56 world leaders to
address the plenary session ofthe United
Nations Conference on Environment and
De'!el0!J~e::t (UN"""::: ), out of a cOtalaf
116 a~~endin&said; '''''''''nereve~sal of ou!
planet's degradation will be tha: lUuch
easier a;:<ds?eedie, ~f we were to join
hands together in such endeavours. I
suggestthe setting up of joint ventures or
joint research and development projects
between the developed and developing
countries, to tackle environmental issues
together. We need to tackle these practi-
cal questions through international co-
operation."
During his entire speech, Mr. Rao's
emphasis was upon what he called·'a
symbiosis of environment and develop-
ment.' ''We cannot have conservation of
the environment without the promise of
development, even as we cannot have
sustained development without the pres-
e~fa-:ionof the €n-:n!'Or.~.•er:t,1J r.€ ~Cx:T""~1
The l'dme Minister cited how India
had emDar~<edon a massive programrr.€
to develop non-conventional scur.:es of
energy, particularly solar and wind en-
ergy. Although such know-how was
available, it was said to be un-economi-
cal at the moment. "I have no doubt an
earnest effort as well as a determined bid
to achieve economies of scale, will make
it economically attractive and acceptable."
Mr. Rao said that the north had to
bear an equitable financial burden for
accessing environment-friendly technolo-
gies. Indeed, the precess had to start with
stopping the tr,msfer of destructive tech-
nologies, which alone will give incentive
to the development of environment-
friendly technologies.
Earth Summit - the mother
of all summits - which
ended at Rio de Janeiro
on June 14,1992 made a history of sorts.
As many as 172 countries out of a total of
178 U.N. members were represented at it
while no fewer than 115 heads of state or
governments participated in it.
From Stockholm where the first UN.
conference on environment was held in
1972 - incidentally only two heads of
state were present there - to Rio has been
a long and tortuous journey.
Whether it was just another junket
or the beginning of a global effort for a
global cause is a matter of opinion.
However, there is no denying the fact
tha t a colossal effort and expendi ture had
gone into this grand show intended to
save the planet Earth for future genera-
tions. At the end of it - North-South
bickerings and the games of one u pman-
ship notwithstanding - the world leaders
Signed their pledges and made promises
in the 27 principles of the Rio Declara-
tion, the 40 cha pters of Agenda 21and the
Declarations of the principles of Forestry.
At the parallel conference of NGOs 30
alternate treaties were worked out whereby
the NGOs reaffirmed their own commit-
ments to caring for the earth and its
people, as also in fighting hunger and
-illiteracy.
The most unfortunate part of the
official proceedings was the torgetful-
ness about the population problem which
received just a passing reference.
As leader of the Indian delegation,
Environment Minister Kamal Nath's was
an impressive performance in putting
across the concerns of the developing
countries, though at times he appeared to
be overdoing in the "hol y war of words",
as one delegate termed the Summit dis-
cussions.
According to Mr. Anil Agarwal of
the Centre for Science and Environment,
Ahmedabad who was a member of the
Indian delegation, India had immense
stakes in each of the three major issues -
climate, biodiversity and forestry. India's
biggest victory", Mr. Agarwal avers was
to "force the inclusion of the Third World
perception that forests are a community
resource which belong to the people
of a country and cannot be handed
over for global management".
In another vein Ms. Vandana Shiva,
an environment activist who participated
in the NGO deliberations at Rio,described
Rio as the ''biggest green wash in his-
tory". She regretted the "painful refrain
that money is the bottom line. Our gov-
ernment more than any other talked ofit,
and we hit rock bottom."
In his final press conference, the
Secretary-General of the Earth Summit,
Maurice Strong, warned: 'We did not
succeed 20 years after the Stockholm
conference and we don't have another 20
years to waste. The evidence is v;;ry
powerful. The present course of economic
behaviour will lead to tragedy. We have
goUo get this message through to people
and they must hold their governments
accountable" .
I also wish that the Brazil Earth Summit shall specifically highlight the fact that
environmental balance has to be restored by wise technology choices and containing
world popUlation. Thus, as a follow-up to the Summit, I would like to see greater
importance being given to the goal of popUlation stabilisation which. in effect. means
wider access to means of reducing infant mortality, maternal mortality, nutritional
deficiency, exposure to debilitating diseases, and, of course, restricting the family size.
It will also mean much more investment in education. because demand for contraception
can be sustained only if the people have the right education to take the right deCisions.
The secret of demographic transition, in my judgement, is awareness. Nothing but
education can create awareness and sustain the momentum of constructive change
(From a Press interview given by Mr. J.R.D. Tata to'lchiro Kikuchi. Special
Correspondent of "Shanke Shimbun", Japan on March 12. 1992.
Published by the FAMILY PLANNING FOUNDATION, 8-28, Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi-110016. Tel.: 6867080,6867081.
D~signed and Printed by Reproductions India, B-9, Manjusha, 57 Nehru Place, New Delhi-110019.Tel.: 6466624, 6429091.
Editorial Directon & Guidance: Harish Khanna
£:::jitcrialConsultant: J.L. Saaz