NATIONAL SEMINAR
In his presertation of IMR in UP,
Dr. P. Misra said that the decline had
been slower and :1 wide gap existed
between rural and ur'oan areas. He drew
attention to the poor utilisation ofMCH
care and most oJ the deliveries were not
getting any skilled attention. He felt the
need to strengthen ~he IEC activities to
draw more people into the programme.
Several background papers based
on NFHS data formed the basis of Sixth
session chaired by Dr. K. Srinivasan,
Executive Director, PFI. According to
Dr. G. Rama Rao, IIPS, Bombay, the
IMR declines sharpl y with the increasing
education of m.others, ranging from a
high of 86 p~r 1,000 live births for
illiterate mothers to a low of 35 per
1,000 live births for women with at least
high school education. Dr. Rao said that
risk of neo-natal deaths in women who
studied till high school and above
reduced by 58 percent as compared to
_.•/
mothers who wp-re illiterate. It was also
important that women avoid early
(below 20) and later (over 30) child
bearing as ~he ::isk of neo-natal as well
as post-natlll deaths were high in these
age groups.
Dr. N. P. Das, while discussing the
differential impact of the programme
factors vis-a-vis socio-economic
variables in reducing infant mortality,
said that mere inputs were not adequate,
but their effective reach had an impact'
on IMR reduction. He was of the opinion
that socio~onomic development had a
greater potential than the programme
-, - -factors, to influence all the-proximate
.determinants affecting infant mortality.
He stressed the need to give priority to
mother and child nutrition,
environmental sanitation in IEC and
training programme.
Pointing out the great regional
variation in terms of demographic
indicators in Karnataka, Dr. P. H.
Rayappa, said that out of 20 districts of
the state, the growth rate of five districts
had been quite high. The NFHS data
has not able to provide an assessment
On the quality of delivery system, that
has a great impact on the IMR reduction.
He also dr'ew attention to the decline in
quality ofh,=alth services in recent years
because of ANMs being overburdened
and suggested that attention should be
paid to involve NGOs for better quality
services.
Dr. Sanjay Kumar of PFI, while
presenting
the socio-economic
differentials and correlates of child
mortality based on NFHS data, found
significant differentials in child
mortality across the states. He said that
parent's education, role of mass media
and sanitation facilities had a significaHt
impact on the child mortality level. He
suggested that NGOs should work as a
catalyst between service providers and
service users and they could also work
as co-ordinating agencies for various
government services to enhance the
socio-economic,
health
and
demographic conditions of the people.
Dr. Y. N. Mathur of UNICEF, in a
session on experiences of the
International Organisation in health
sector said that NGOs need to have
positive attitude and clean image both
with people around and service
providers. They also need to have good
professional support and networking in
the delivery system. Dr. Mathur
emphasised that NGO must play a
catalytic role and strongly felt that they
must have clear cut exit policies by
which he meant that NGOs must
energise the community and decide
when to quit from those areas after
providing the kind of impetus that was
needed
for
sustainability.
"Sustainabili ty ,
transparency,
accountability and financial stability
are must for NGQs so that they are not
donor driven or driven by other
agencies", Dr. Mathur added.
On the role of USAID in reducing
IMR, Ms. Rajni Ved said her agency had
supported many NGOs and expansion
plan for serving underserved areas and
prOVided necessary infrastructure for
improvement of services. She said
importance had been given to
institutional strengthening of NGOs
and also support to other development
agencies. She strongly recommended
that NGOs should be encouraged for
sustainability by helping them set up
corpus funds. "As donors one should be
thinking about making NGOs
sustain.able so that they can carryon
doing better than what.they are doing,"
she added.
Ms.
Christina
Bierring,
International Programme Officer,
UNFPA informed that its programmes
had considered women's status and
access to reproductive health and family
planning services as major factors
influencing IMR and fertility. She said
NGOs were critical to support and
reinforce government action to
effectively implement the post-Cairo
policies and programmes. The real issue
she said was, "how can NGO
experiences be absorbed as good
practices by the government health
infrastructure to make innovative
programmes sustainable."
Dr. Orapin Singhadej informed that
WHO follows the concept of safe
motherhood and new-born care coupled
with family planning, women's equity,
greater emphasis on trained midwives
to provide quality care to mother and
infant. But she regretted having no
linkage with NGOs as all WHO's health
activities had been implemented
through government agencies.
Summing up the session Dr. Anwar
Islam said that three key areas where
NGOs could playa critical role were:
one of a catalyst for community
mobilisation of serving as a linkage
between the community and the service
providers; and as an advocacy group
for integrating the health needs and
services. He cautioned that the donors
and government should not view NGO's
role as a one-way street but to take the
responsibility of how to empower them
and fulfrl their infrastructural needs so
that in the long run they become
sustainable themselves.
Chairing the concluding session,
Mr. B.C. Verghese, Journalist and
Research Professor, CPR, Delhi, hoped
that from Dr. K. Srinivasan's summation
of the two-days' deliberation and
recommendations from them will be of
tremendous val ue in shaping the policies
and programmes to reduce IMR and
Fertility in the country.
Recommendations on page 10