PFI's Think-tank Throws up Valuable suggestions
on its Advocacy, Research and Operational Roles
The population situation in
India had shown some signs
of optimism though there was
still much to be desired in the delivery
of services.' this view was expressed
by Dr M S Swaminathan, the world-
renowed agricultural scientist-and
an ardent advocate of population
and environment causes, while
presiding over a meeting of the
Advisory Council of PFI held on Oct.
18,1994. Dr Swaminathan, it may be
recalled, headed the group of experts
known as the Swaminathan
Committee, which presented its
report on the New Population Policy
"tothe government in May this year.
('Focus' April-June, 1994).
Dr. Swaminathan felt that
institutions like PFI should continue
making earnest efforts to encourage
new thinking with the aim of
influencing policy. It should build up
a case for increased expenditure in
the social sector and emphasise the
crucial value of primary health care.
He fully endorsed the views of the
other members that the research role
of the PH should be expanded, within
which there should be more social
science research related to specific
problems and particular areas.
Watch-dog Role
He stated that in our
communication strategy, we should
try to project a message of hope, and
show how some states and some
districts in the otherwise backward
states, had succeeded in bringing
down infant mortality, maternal
mortality and even fertility.
Dr. Swaminathan observed that
rapidly evolving economic policy
would eventually impact social
policy, which mayor may not be to
the equal advantage of different
sections of the people. He would like
PFI and similar independent
organisations to assume a modest
watch-dog role so that health and
education receive primacy in plans.
Dr. Swaminathan felt that
delivery systems needed to be
carefully researched, more because too, even in the five States chosen by
they had tremendous impact on the the Foundation as the principal focus
success of any reproductive health of its interest.
programme. Similarly, there should
be pilot studies on decentralised
Strong Research Agenda
pattern of planning and implemen-
Prof P C Joshi suggested that
tation of health programmes, fusion . while dealing with the population
of vertical development progra- question, both sociological and econo-
mmes; provision of health security mic perspectives should receive equal
and guaranteeing easy access to attention. He felt that the Foundation
reproductive health counselling and should not only interest itself in the
availability of contraceptives.
operational side of the programme,
Referring to the Population- but also pursue a knowledge seeking
Environment
linkages,
role. In his opinion, demography
Dr. Swaminathan
advised needed to be studied as a part of
appreciation of issues concerning Development theory. From this point
natural resource management and of view, he opined that besides
evaluation of non-monetary inputs funding operational projects, PFI
in social development. Referring to should structure a strong research
the suggestion to prepare socio- agenda and collaborate with other
demographic charters relevant to qualified institutions.
village and municipal committee
levels, Dr. Swaminathan suggested
Inducing Behavioural
that PFI could perform valuable role Change
in developing models and even
producing suitable training modules.
Mr T V Antony gave a brief
description of the Tamil Nadu
Linkages with State
population movement recounting
Governments
Dr Pai Panandiker observed
that in the strategy adopted by the
Family Planning Foundation (now
PFI), established
under the
committed leadership of the late Mr
J R D Tata, advocacy had been given
due importance. He added that after
careful consideration, the Foundation
had decided to devote greater
attention to building up effective
linkages with the State Governments,
because its projects, which were
implemented in the States, largely
depended on the amount of
some important factors which were
the mainstay of the refurbished
family welfare programme in the
State. He said a mere clinical
approach was not enough. A number
of important welfare measures such
as providing mid-day meals to 70
lakh school children in schools which,
incidentally, provided em.ployment
to 70,000 women, became an
important factor in social action in
favour of attaching value to the
health of mothers and children.
Behavioural change became easy
because approach to welfare was
humane. He welcomed the
participatory support provided by
the State Administrations.
The
Foundation had also thought
interaction at the political level
necessary for a strong political
consensus. He observed, with a sense
of hope, the dramatic improvement
in the status of family planning in
Tamil Nadu and pointed out that if
proper efforts were mounted, the
situation could improve elsewhere
suggestion of a detailed study of the
Tamil Nadu experience.
Prof K Srinivasan observed that
although there had been some signs
of improvement, by and large, the
results of the family planning pro-
gramme as practised in different
parts of the country were disappoint-
ing. In his opinion, since the State
«s«. 071 pnge: 7)
6