FPF recently took the initiative to
ask for an independent, high-
powered evaluation committee to
review its work since inception.
It is a matter of gratification that
the Evaluation Committee headed
by ex-Chief Justice G D Khosla had
the following comments to make:
"After careful consideration of
the various aspects of its working
and the results obtained so far
we are firmly of the view that:
(i) The Foundation has so far.
performed a significant and
worthwhile role in the promotion of
its objectives in the context of the
crucial pervasive problem of
population growth and the official
programme of family planning;
(ii) It has established its
credentials as one of the most
effective organisations of national
importance of its kind;
(iii) Its role in the promotion of
much needed bio-social research is
well appreciated by individuals
and institutions who know and
understand the nature and wide
canvass of its activities;
(iv) Due care has, on the whole,
been exercised in the selection
and support of research projects;
(v) It has shown requisite initiative
and discrimination in s.upporting
research projects of varied nature;
(vi) The Foundation's Executive
has generally kept a close watch
over tt"teprogress of projects
supported by it and has not
hesitated to withdraw the support
as and when circumstances
warranted it;
(vii) There have, however, been a
few instance of projects not
coming up to expectations for
reasons which were not always
such as could not have been
anticipated; and
(viii) Miscarriage of project has,
in most such cases, occurred from
factors beyond the control of the
Foundation and their proportion
has been much below what
would be expected in a pioneering
venture in a hitherto uncharted
field of action research concerning
such intimate behaviour as
that of reproduction.
Policies and
Procedures
FPF furnishes the necessary
underpi nnings of technical and
financial aid for programmes which
fall within the scope of its policy
for promoting action research
in areas which offer hope of
practical solutions for problems
identified as targets of attack.
The criteria for selection of such
programmes is exacting: not only
must projects approved for support
have a critical connection to
family planning need3, but they
must be, in addition, development
oriented, innovative, replicable and
economical with an emphasis on
optimum use of existing
technical and allied infrastructure.
There is no duplication of
government efforts, rather it
provides a critical support in a
creative spirit.
Notwithstanding FPF's marginal
funds in comparison to the
SUMMARY OF
PROJECTS SUPPORTED
1972 TO 1978
2.35,000
( 12)
1,90,186
( 29)
A-Action/Applied Research/Demonstration] .
B-Biomedical Programme - Basic Research
and Study
C -Evaluation /Survey /Studies / Review /
Policy Research/Communication
D - Conferences/Seminars / Workshops
E-Publications.
government budget for this work,
its flexibility in action and
independence of judgement enables
it to perform a crucial function,
since it can move quickly to
support projects with potential that
might be denied or delayed
government support under the
latter's specified procedures.
It can initiate and support schemes
calling for unorthodox research
approaches. This entrepreneurial-
type dynamism has secured for
FPF an avante-garde reputation:
of an organisation capable of
remote sensing problems yet to
come and ahead with leads and
directions to solve them.
The bulk of the funds for FPF
operations have been raised from
the private sector, largely from
industrial houses within India.
In the formative stage, the
Ford Foundation made a generous
grant of $ 200,000 subject to three
times this amount being raised
by the Indian Industrial Community
Upto 31 st December 1978,
FPF had raised Rs 8.3 million
($ 1 million) in India and had
received a support grant of
Rs 2.3 million ($ 300,000) from
the Ford Foundation in addition to
Rs 1.67 million ($ 200,000), for a
collaborative programme of
research in the field of Human
Reproductive Physiology and
Contraceptive Techniques.
FPF has been able to earn
interest on its capital fund of
Rs 4.73 million ($ 0.59 million)
during the last few years. Its annual
budget for supporting programmes!
projects has risen to Rs 2 million
($ 0.25 million) which may be
increased to Rs 3 million (S 0.37
million) and the annual budget for
Establishment and Promotional
Activities is about Rs 0.5 million
($ 0.06 million).
The Governing Board has now
decided to start another drive for
fund raising in India and the target
fixed for collection of donations
over the next two years is about