 |
JRD Tata Award 2008 |
|
|
1 Pages 1-10 |
▲back to top |
|
|
1.1 Page 1 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD
for
Population & Reproductive
Health Programmes
2008
Population Foundation of India
|
|
1.2 Page 2 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
The Man and His Vision
B harat Ratna, the late Mr JRD
Tata, was among those handful of
world citizens whom destiny
itself so shaped to become an institution
in a life-time. He had been regarded as
one of the stalwarts among Indians in the
20th Century, who stamped his personality
on the country’s affairs both before and
after independence. He was the crusader
for the promotion of family planning, both
as a tool of curbing India’s rapidly-
increasing population, and an entirely new
way of life in a developing society in which
a family is not mere numbers but valuable
relationships of shared growth.
The late Mr Tata had promoted and
fostered several causes in the service of
science and nation. His holistic view of
the population problem had turned him
into an equally strong humanist,
concerned no less with the problems of
poverty and environment, intertwined
with population. Mr Tata was the first to
3|Population Foundation of India
raise an alarm in 1951, in
the course of a speech, about
the continuous and fast
growth of the India’s
population and its serious potential
consequences to the country’s economy
and progress. Realising later the need for
non-governmental action, he founded the
Family Planning Foundation in 1970, of
which he was the founder Chairman.
Family Planning Foundation was re-
christened as the Population Foundation
of India in 1993 to reflect the wider
dimensions of the population issue in a
changing world. Mr Tata’s unique services
in the cause of population had been
recognised by the United Nations who had
chosen him for their prestigious
Population Award for 1992. For his many
splendoured achievements, India also
conferred on him ‘Bharat Ratna’, the
highest civilian award of the Nation in
1992.
|
|
1.3 Page 3 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
The Foundation
The Population Foundation of India
(formerly known as Family
Planning Foundation) was
established in 1970 by a dedicated group
of industrialists and population activists
led by Bharat Ratna the late Mr JRD Tata
who guided it as the founder Board
Chairman until his death in 1993. After
his demise, Dr Bharat Ram, noted
industrialist and a founding member of the
Foundation, was its Board Chairman.
After his demise in 2007, Mr. Hari Shankar
Singhania, renowned industrialist took
over as the Board Chairman of the
foundation.
The Foundation has been in the
forefront of non-governmental efforts at
population stabilisation and establishing
a balance between resources, environment
and population.
Social development including
population stabilisation in India should
not and cannot remain the sole concern of
the Government. It ought to be supported
and supplemented by private voluntary
enterprises. In this regard, the
Foundation has always worked in close co-
operation and co-ordination with official
agencies and programmes, both at the
Centre and in the States.
In its independent role, it has tried to
guide and influence the National
Population Policy and to serve as a
catalytic agent to promote programmes at
different levels directed towards the
ultimate goal of population stabilisation.
The Foundation supports innovative
research, experimentation and social
action to further the cause of population
stabilisation and provide a forum for
pooling of experiences and sharing of
professional expertise to strengthen and
enlarge the operational base of the
Reproductive and Child Health (RCH)
programmes.
Population Foundation of India |4
|
|
1.4 Page 4 |
▲back to top |
The Award
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
W hen the founder Board
Chairman of the Foundation
Mr JRD Tata passed away in
1993, having laid a strong base for a social
movement to stabilise the growth of
population in India as an essential
prerequisite to attain higher qualities of
life for the Indian people, the Foundation
felt that it would be a fitting tribute to the
great man if national awards were
instituted in his name to further the cause
for which he was a champion
acknowledged all over the world.
In February 1996, the PFI Governing
Board formally decided to institute
national awards for the best State and the
best districts with outstanding
performance in population and
reproductive health and family planning
programme.
5|Population Foundation of India
|
|
1.5 Page 5 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
The Significance of the Award
The process of integration of related
programmes of maternal and child
health initiated with the
implementation of the Child Survival and
Safe Motherhood (CSSM) Programme was
taken a step further in 1994 when the
International Conference on Population
and Development(ICPD) in Cairo
recommended that the participant
countries should implement unified
programmes for reproductive health.
India took the lead by introducing the
target-free approach to family welfare
programmes from April 1996. During the
9th Plan, the RCH Programme,
accordingly, integrated all the related
programmes of the 8th Plan on maternal
and child health, family planning,
adolescent sexual health, etc. The concept
of RCH is to provide to the beneficiaries
need based, client centred, demand
driven, high quality and integrated RCH
services.
It is a legitimate right of the citizens
to be able to experience sound
Reproductive and Child Health and
therefore the RCH Programme seeks to
provide relevant services for assuring
Reproductive and Child Health to all
citizens. RCH is even more relevant for
obtaining the objective of population
stabilization in the country.
The selection of winners for the
Awards is not dependent just on the
current levels of performance in a number
of crucial indicators. Emphasis has been
given on the change factor signifying the
pace of progress achieved over a period of
time. It is well known that despite the
relatively slow performance in the field
of RCH for the country as a whole, there
are States within the country, which have
Population Foundation of India |6
|
|
1.6 Page 6 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
made significant strides in the field of
Reproductive and Child Health and their
achievements are comparable to the best
even in advanced societies. These
demonstrate that, given the leadership,
will and conditions, such success can be
repeated in other regions. The awards are
recognition of this sustained effort and
will hopefully generate the much needed
impetus and confidence amongst the
others that they could also achieve the
same standards. The criteria adopted for
the selection cover various aspects of
human development and reproductive
health.
Accordingly, the first JRD Tata
Memorial Awards were announced on July
29, 1997 and were given to the winning
State and districts by the Prime Minister
of India, in a function organised by the
Foundation on 13th November 1997.
The first JRD Tata Memorial Award
for the best performing State was given to
Kerala. Awards for the best performing
districts were given to three districts,
7|Population Foundation of India
namely, Palakkad in Kerala (in the large
population size category), Toothukudi in
Tamil Nadu (in the medium population
size category) and Kurukshetra in
Haryana (in the small population size
category).
The second JRD Tata Memorial
Awards were announced on 28th July 2000
and were given to the winning state and
districts by the Union Minister of Health
and Family Welfare in a function organised
by the Foundation on 3rd January 2001.
The second JRD Tata Memorial Award
for the best performing State was given to
Tamil Nadu. Awards for the best
performing districts were given to three
districts, namely, Chennai in Tamil Nadu
(in the large population size category),
Alappuzha in Kerala (in the medium
population size category) and Jorhat in
Assam (in the small population size
category). Awards were also given to the
best performing district in the not so good
performing states. In this category, the
districts of Dehradun in the then Uttar
|
|
1.7 Page 7 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Pradesh, Purbi Singhbhum in the
erstwhile Bihar and Cuttack in Orissa
were adjudged the winners.
The third JRD Tata Memorial Award
for the best performing state was given by
Vice President of India to Himachal
Pradesh on November 7, 2003. Awards for
the best performing districts were given
to three districts, namely, West Godavari
in Andhra Pradesh (in the large
population category), Churu in Rajasthan
(in the medium population category) and
Lahul & Spiti in Himachal Pradesh (in the
small population category). Awards were
also given to the best performing districts
in the not so good performing states. In
this category, the districts of Ri Bhoi in
Meghalaya, Ranchi in Jharkhand and
Bhagalpur in Bihar were adjudged the
winners.
Population Foundation of India |8
|
|
1.8 Page 8 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Fourth JRD TATA Memorial Awards, 2008
Technical Advisory Committee
A Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) was formed, comprising
experts from diverse academic
affiliations. The TAC guided the
Foundation in selection of indicators and
appropriate methodology for the selection
of state level awards.
Dr. A.K. Shiva Kumar, Senior Advisor,
UNICEF, was the chairperson of the
committee. The other members were:
• Dr. P.M. Kulkarni, Professor, Centre
for Study in Regional Development
(CSRD), Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi.
• Dr. Saraswati Raju, Professor,
Centre for Study in Regional
Development (CSRD), Jawaharlal
Nehru University, New Delhi.
• Dr. Faujdar Ram, Director and
9|Population Foundation of India
Senior Professor, International
Institute for Population Sciences
(IIPS), Mumbai
Award Committee
A high level Award Committee was
constituted to go into the issue in depth
and set standard and ground rules for the
awards.
Ms. Justice Leila Seth, Former Chief
Justice of Himachal Pradesh and member
of the Governing Board of PFI, was the
Chairperson of the award committee for
the year 2008.
The other members were:
• Dr. M. S. Swaminathan, noted
Agricultural Scientist, Magsaysay
Award winner, Chairman, M. S.
Swaminathan Research Foundation
and Chairman, Advisory Council, PFI.
• Mr. B. G. Deshmukh, former Cabinet
|
|
1.9 Page 9 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Secretary and Vice Chairman,
Governing Board PFI.
• Dr. Abid Hussain, former Ambassador
of India in USA and Member,
Governing Board, PFI.
• Prof. K. Srinivasan, former Executive
Director, PFI and former Director,
International Institute for Population
Sciences, Mumbai.
• Mrs. Nirmala Buch, I.A.S (Retd.).
• Dr. A. K. Shiva Kumar, Senior
Advisor, UNICEF and Chairperson
Technical Advisory Committee for the
Tata Award, 2008.
• Dr. P. M. Kulkarni, Professor, Centre
for Study in Regional Development
(CSRD), Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi and Member, Technical
Advisory Committee for the Tata
Award, 2008.
• Mr. A. R. Nanda, Executive Director,
PFI.
Population Foundation of India |10
|
|
1.10 Page 10 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
The Methodology
State
For the selection of states for the
4th JRD Tata Memorial awards, it
was decided by the award
committee to institute two state level
awards, one among the bigger population
category(population of 10 million and
above) and another among smaller
population category(population of less
than 10 million).The selection of the states
for the state level award 2008 has been
done on the basis of 14 indicators, for
which data were compiled from various
published sources. These indicators were
finalized on the basis of
recommendations of the Technical
Advisory Committee. These indicators
have a strong bearing on reproductive
health, gender equity, family planning
and fertility levels of the population.
While selecting the 4th JRD Tata
Memorial Awards for the states, it was
decided by the award committee to defer
11|Population Foundation of India
the district level awards till the
availability of next round of DLHS data
as due to large reorganization of districts
the change was not accessed while
selecting the best districts.
|
|
2 Pages 11-20 |
▲back to top |
|
|
2.1 Page 11 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Indicators
Sl. No. Indicator
Source
1
Women(20-24 years) married before age 18 NFHS II & III
2
CPR (Contraceptive Prevalence Rate)
–any methods
NFHS II & III
3
Full Immunization
NFHS II & III
4
TFR(Total Fertility Rate)
NFHS II & III
5
At least 3 ANC(Ante-natal check ups) visits NFHS II & III
6
Safe Delivery
NFHS II & III
7
% Children underweight(weight for age) NFHS II & III
8
IMR (Infant Mortality Rate)
SRS (Sample Registration
System), 1999 and 2005
9
Under Five Mortality Rate
(Male/Female Ratio)
Indirect Estimates, Census 2001
10
Child Sex Ratio(0-6 years)
Census, 1991 and 2001
11
Girls School Attendance Rate (6-14 years) Census, 1991 and 2001
12
Female Youth (15-24 years) Literacy Rate Census, 1991 and 2001
13
Literacy Rate (7 and more years)
Census, 1991 and 2001
14
Planned Expenditure on Social Sector,1997 National Human Development
and 2004
Report,2001 and Statistical
Abstract India,2001
Population Foundation of India |12
|
|
2.2 Page 12 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Sources of Data
The first seven indicators have been derived from the last two rounds of the National
Family Health Survey (NFHS-II & III). The data on child sex ratio, girls school attendance
rate, female youth literacy and literacy rate are from the Census of India 1991 and 2001
and IMR is from the SRS. The M/F (Male/Female) ratio of under five mortality is based on
the indirect estimate from 2001 Census by Brass method. Social Sector includes education,
health, water supply and sanitation, urban development, information and welfare & labour.
Planned expenditure on social sector for the year 1997-98 is an average of 1996-98. Similarly,
planned expenditure for the year 2004-05 is an average of 2003-06.
As data are compiled from different sources, the base year and final year are not the
same for all the fourteen indicators. Efforts have been made to compile data for the most
recent year and making the indicators comparable. The base and final years of the different
state level indicators are as follows:
Source
Base Year
Final Year
Census
1991
2001
NFHS
1998-99
2005-06
SRS
1999
2005
National Human Development Report & Statistical 1997-98
Abstract, India,2001
2004-05
13|Population Foundation of India
|
|
2.3 Page 13 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Selection of the Best Performing State
Step 1 :
At first step, as it has been followed by UNDP for Human Development Index (HDI)
each variable is converted into an index ranging from 0 to 100. The index is computed as:
For positive indicators (like use of family planning and utilization of ANC) :
(State value - Minimum Value)
Index =
x 100
(Maximum value - Minimum value)
For negative indicators (like TFR and IMR) :
(Maximum value – State value)
Index =
x 100
(Maximum value - Minimum value)
Step 2 :
Secondly, a composite index is computed for base year and final year on the basis of
these fourteen indices. This composite index is the simple average of fourteen indices.
Step 3 :
Thirdly, a score is obtained for each state by combining the recent levels and changes
over the base and final years in the composite index in the ratio of 1:4.
Population Foundation of India |14
|
|
2.4 Page 14 |
▲back to top |
The Winners
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
After final ranking of the nineteen
bigger states (population of 10
million and above) on the basis of
composite index, Chhattisgarh emerged
as the best state and among the ten
smaller states (population of less than 10
million) Sikkim emerged as the best state.
Chhattisgarh got a high score among all
the bigger states in the composite index
as the change is observed to be the highest
among all the 19 bigger states. Similarly
among 10 smaller states, Sikkim emerged
as the winner state, as the change in
between the base year and the final year
for Sikkim is observed to be the highest.
15|Population Foundation of India
|
|
2.5 Page 15 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Population Foundation of India |16
|
|
2.6 Page 16 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Profile of the Winners
T he best performing States have
their distinct characteristics,
which have led to their success.
These relate varyingly to the historical
past, the geographical location, the ethnic
composition, the social structure, political
commitment to development such as
population policies, bureaucratic
efficiency and other determinants which
contribute to the achievement. A study of
some of these factors would be rewarding
for other comparable areas.
Winner among Bigger States
The 4th JRD Tata Memorial awards for
execellence in reproductive health &
population programmes for the year 2008
is own by Chhattisgarh. The State with a
score of 115.8 ranked first among the
bigger states, followed by Rajasthan &
Andhra Pradesh with scores of 103.5 &
100.6 respectively.
Chhattisgarh is one of the bigger states
of India with a populaiton of about 21
million persons according to the 2001
Census. Chhattisgarh was carved out from
Eastern part of Madhya Pradesh and the
State of Chhattisgarh came into existence
on 1st November 2000 as the 26th states
of the Union of India. The State has made
significant strides in developing an
educational and health infrastructure and
transport and communication
networks.These advances had a significant
impact on the socio-economic and
demorgraphic status of the state.
Chhattisgarh ranks favourably in
many of the indices used to determine the
performance of reporductive and child
heath programmes in the states.
Chhattisgarh has made improvement in
almost all the indicators considered for the
4th JRD Tata Memorial award. Full
17|Population Foundation of India
|
|
2.7 Page 17 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
immunization for the state improved from
20.0 in 1998-99 to 48.7 in 2005-06. Similarly
for at least three ANC visits, the figure
got a boost from 33.2 in 1998-99 to 54.2 in
2005-06. The state has also shown
improvement, in safe delivery, children
underweight and infant mortality rate.
Winner among Smaller States
Sikkim attained statehood as the 22nd
state of the Indian Union in 1975. It is one
of the smaller states of India. It is having
population of half million according to the
2001 Census. Among the smaller states
(population of less than 10 million),
Sikkim has done well in relation to all the
indicators considered for the 4th JRD Tata
Memorial award. The state has shown
remarkable improvement in terms of
couple protection rate (53.8 to 57.6), full
immunization (47.4 to 69.6), at least three
ANC visits (42.6 to 70.1) in between two
successive National Family Health
Surveys (1998-99 and 2005-06). The state
has also made substantial reduction in
infant mortality rate and percentage of
children underweight. The change in
between the overall index of final year and
base year was found to be highest for the
State of Chhattisgarh (13.5) among bigger
states. For Sikkim change was found to be
second highest (9.6) among smaller states.
This resulted in selection of the two states
under bigger and smaller population
category states for the 4th JRD Tata
Memorial Awards.
Population Foundation of India |18
|
|
2.8 Page 18 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
19|Population Foundation of India
|
|
2.9 Page 19 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Sikkim on the Path of Development
P.D. Rai*
This article is less about numbers
and more about ideas and the
political economy – it captures the
development in total coordination with the
policies set out by the Planning
Commission of India, participating fully
essence of the direction of development,
from the 5th Five Year Plan onwards.
the policy instruments and indeed the flow
Today it has attained spectacular growth
of Government funds to the people of
in an atmosphere of peace and communal
Sikkim and its impact, as has been studied
harmony, growing at a per capita GSDP
by independent institutions. There are
of Rs. 26,215 (2004-05)1 and maintaining
many discrepancies and downsides, but as
rate of growth at about 10 percent per
all development is about tradeoffs, these
annum.
are being handled albeit in a way by
So the ups and downs of development
acknowledging their import.
that has persisted in India have also
Sikkim’s leap into the 21st Century
Sikkim joined the national mainstream
as the 22nd State of the Indian Union in
1975. Since then it has taken up the
affected the State. Sikkim’s accelerated
growth in the last ten years is indeed visible.
Whether it has been done in a significantly
different manner than others is a matter of
debate.
1 North-Eastern Region(NER), Vision 2020
*Deputy Chairman, Sikkim State Planning Commission, Government of Sikkim, Tashiling, Gangtok 737101, Sikkim
Population Foundation of India |20
|
|
2.10 Page 20 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
21|Population Foundation of India
|
|
3 Pages 21-30 |
▲back to top |
|
|
3.1 Page 21 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Sikkim is always described in glowing
terms by nearly all visitors who happen
to come here on one pretext or other.
They find this place gloriously calm. The
hills and mountains dazzle. The peace and
tranquillity thrill. However, they also
report a sudden disquiet especially after
they have visited Nathula and gone
through the major part of Gangtok in some
detail. Pinpointing it may not be politically
correct. So we hear sentences like
“Gangtok could have been better planned!”
or “The traffic is quite something!”
The State is, geopolitically, highly
strategic even though it is so small an area
in the Eastern Himalayas. The mountain
passes of Jelepla and Nathula make it
prized in terms of access to the Tibetan
Plateau and to the economic, social and
political exchanges. It offers the shortest
route to Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, from
Kolkata and its sea ports – a mere 1350 Km
or so. The British conquered Sikkim by the
late 1800s for this very strategic reason
and Sikkim became part of India in 1975.
Always a bone of contention with China,
Sikkim is now acknowledged as part of India
by that country but not after extracting
some major concessions. Tibet has been
recognized by India as part of China. Dalai
Lama is not to be highlighted, not even his
vision of a free autonomous Tibet under
China.
Size Matters
The State’s land size is miniscule. With
a population of a little more than half a
million it is sparsely populated, one of the
specificities of mountain communities.
Indeed access to and for villagers is always
a challenge. Sikkim has but only 7 percent
land out of our 7096 Sq Km which can be
made habitable by world standards2 . The
rest is too steep or wilderness. Little wonder
then that it has over 80 percent of the land
as Forests. Forest cover is increasing and
2 Surbana International Consultants, Strategic Urban Plan Report 2040, Singapore – commissioned by GOS
Population Foundation of India |22
|
|
3.2 Page 22 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
23|Population Foundation of India
|
|
3.3 Page 23 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
at about 40 percent. Sikkim is proud of this
great biodiversity reserve contributing
significantly to India’s overall reserve.
Sikkim’s forests have been regenerated
after policies which can be considered
perhaps the greenest in India. Two most
important initiatives of the Government
have been the Green Mission and the
removal of graziers from high altitude
pastures, since this was becoming
unsustainable. Alternative livelihoods have
been provided though implementation is
still an issue.
How can a small mountain state make
it thus far? Only from generous plan and
non plan funding from Government of India.
Sikkim’s own resources are limited and
only eco-tourism and Hydro power is the key
to generate any real level of State resources.
If and when Nathula pass opens up fully
for trade then the State will have to find a
mechanism of getting a share of the trade
surpluses that will inevitably accrue. So,
Sikkim’s annual plan size and non plan
component is mainly funded by assistance
from the Centre. The State is a special
category one. Furthermore, in 2002 Sikkim
was assimilated into the North Eastern
Council as the eighth member. This has
opened up another pool of assistance from
the NEC as well as the non-lapsable pool of
resources of Government of India through
the Ministry of Development of North-
Eastern Region (DONER).
Not all sections of society are happy with
the Hydro Power projects that are being
implemented in the State. However,
dialogue has always been welcomed with
dissenters. Many projects have then been
modified or degraded suitably to take into
account the concerns. However, it is
important to realise that there is justifiable
opposition to the implementation of these
projects. On the other hand Sikkim has very
little options if it wants to become free of
dependence on central funding, even for
running the Government machinery on a
day to day basis. The overheads of
Governance are indeed very high!
The objective is that by 2015 the State
Population Foundation of India |24
|
|
3.4 Page 24 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
25|Population Foundation of India
|
|
3.5 Page 25 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
should be able to take care of the resource
requirements through aforementioned
routes.
Political Power Facilitation
The Government in the State is formed
by the leader of the Sikkim Democratic
Front Party, Dr. Pawan Chamling. Now a
very well known politician in India and is
also known as the ‘greenest’ Chief Minister3 .
The recent IFMR/CDF 2008 award of being
the second in terms of Environmental
Sustainability Index (ESI) among 28 States
in India is in line and correlates positively
with the green policies of the State.
Chief Minister Chamling has been at the
helm of affairs for the last 14 years and into
concluding his third term in office4 . Political
stability has led to an enabling environment
where deepening and indeed widening of
reach of various schemes of State and
Central Government has been facilitated.
The State also has the lowest crime rate
and so today it is best known for being the
most peaceful State in India. Even though
it is strategically placed with eyeball to
eyeball contact with China (Tibet) the
integration with the mainstream is not
really a problem.
In response to the wishes of the people
and during this time in office there has been
a huge fillip given to rural development,
health and universalisation of education.
Right from the start about 70 percent of the
Plan allocation has been used in the villages
of Sikkim. The rural population is over 85
percent and so in many ways this is truly
targeted spending.
Just recently Dr. Chamling personally
received the Rashtriya Nirmal Gram
Puraskar, for 100 percent coverage in
sanitation within the State. This is a clear
indication that there is both depth and reach
in terms of scope of the projects that are
being carried out in the State. This is aided
in part by the network of roads that have
3 First Acknowledged by Centre For Science & Environment (CSE) survey published in Down To Earth Feb 15, 1999 issue
4 Power to the People: 14 Glorious Years of the SDF Government 1994 – 2008, GOS publication
Population Foundation of India |26
|
|
3.6 Page 26 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
27|Population Foundation of India
|
|
3.7 Page 27 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
been built up over the last thirty years.
Being a mountain State it tries its best
to fit the programs offered from Delhi to the
mountain issues of the State. Mountain
specificities are unique. Only recently have
mountain issues have been given some
thought and mind space in the Planning
Commission. Is there now scope for better
policy mechanisms that can be worked out
uniquely for mountain States? This question
is going to receive further impetus in the
time to come as Government grapples with
an ‘inclusive growth’ agenda.
So, with a strong leadership and clear
cut people-centric direction, policies have
been formulated to enable opportunities for
people. Access to funds and programs, for
remote villages, are also facilitated by
respective MLAs and Panchayat leaders.
The way democracy has panned out here
makes this possible. This accounts for
much of the appreciation that Sikkim is
currently receiving in the fields of
environment management, health and
education. The downside is that the rural
people of Sikkim are far more dependent
on Government largesse. This is not a
healthy situation for sustainable growth.
Policy Planning Initiatives
Sikkim was perhaps one of the early
adopters of assessing its Human
Development Index in 20015 . Sikkim’s HDI
is close to the national index if not better.
It was 0.532 in 1999 and should have
increased in the last eight years.
Furthermore, Government commissioned
the making of a Vision Document in 1999
to understand the goals that needed to be
achieved over a sustained period of fifteen
years. Much of it has been achieved though
all have not been fulfilled and lots more
work is still to be done.
One of the key initiatives has been for
Government to set out the direction for
growth. This was documented in the
5 Sikkim Human Development Report 2001, Mahendra P. Lama
Population Foundation of India |28
|
|
3.8 Page 28 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
29|Population Foundation of India
|
|
3.9 Page 29 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Sikkim: The People’s Vision Report
authored by Ashok K. Lahiri et al from the
NIPFP, New Delhi.
‘An accelerated path of eco-friendly
sustainable development’ – this was to be
Sikkim’s growth paradigm. “The aim is to
build on the state’s strengths, benefit from
post-liberalisation spurt in growth in the
rest of the country and, with judicious use
of modern technology, in less than two
decades, leave the centuries of
underdevelopment rapidly behind.”6
Another important aspect was the
stabilization of population. This was to
achieve by 2050 constant population of half
a million. This goal however seems unlikely
to be achieved. Even at that time the
demographic dividend has been well
articulated in the document. We see some
of it playing out today as we find that many
of the young people are working in all
different parts of the country and abroad
in television and media, BPO and IT
6 Sikkim The People’s Vision, NIPFP, page 20
7 Former Foreign Secretary, GOI
industry and emerging financial
businesses. These augers well for a
pronounced impact back in Sikkim in the
years to come. Sikkim will reap its share
of this dividend but a policy to facilitate
this will have to be crafted out.
The means for achieving the overall
vision has been well argued in the
document. This definitely formed the basis
on which much of the growth has happened.
Policies of Government were aligned to the
means as is thought through and stated.
The Government also constituted a
State Planning Commission and requested
Prof. Muchkund Dubey7 to take the post of
Deputy Chairman of the Commission in
2002. He led the team for two consecutive
three year terms. The Commission has been
able to make planning in the State more
professional and capable. Capacity building
of the officers was also done especially in
bringing out much needed reports. This
has allowed for much debate and better
Population Foundation of India |30
|
|
3.10 Page 30 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
articulation of needs of the people. One of
Future Challenges
the best things that came out of the
Future challenges faced by Sikkim in
Commission was the devolution of powers
the short and medium term relate to some
and functions to the Panchayats. District
fundamental issues facing India and the
planning bodies have been constituted and
world today. New economic outlooks will
bottom up approach of planning is now a
have to be factored in even as globalisation
reality. Sikkim has today achieved the
and its attendant problems kick in. Then
status of being recognised as the 3rd best
there is the whole issue of climate change
State to implement the 73rd and 74th
and making carbon friendly if not carbon
Amendments of the Constitution of India.
neutral policy frameworks.
In fact more than 40 percent of women now
Food security can be looked at the first
participate in the Panchayati Raj system of
major challenge in the short term leading
local governance.
to large scale vulnerability of Sikkim’s
Meanwhile, the Millennium
population. Since about 75 percent of our
Development Goals (MDG)8 is another
food is imported the State faces the twin
important set of goals toward which
challenges of increasing domestic
Government works in synchronisation for
production as well as importing food without
achievement by 2015. Sikkim is doing better
hindrance. We have the national highway
than most of the other States in achieving
31A as the only reliable entry to Sikkim.
these goals. Some of them have already been
This is not without hassles from our
achieved. More research and surveys will
neighbours, West Bengal and the
be done in the course of the next one year
Gorkhaland agitators. Furthermore,
to ascertain the exact position and status
severe landslides also have contributed to
of the State.
this especially after the start of the
8 United Nations MDG adopted by GA 2000 – India Country Report 2005
31|Population Foundation of India
|
|
4 Pages 31-40 |
▲back to top |
|
|
4.1 Page 31 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
construction of Teesta Stage 6 low dam
project in West Bengal.
Access is also a major issue when trying
to bring high value tourists into the State.
The long route from Delhi or Kolkata and
then a four hour journey puts many people
off. People would like to come over the
weekend and holiday and get back as soon
as possible, especially those who can afford
to pay rather large sums. This has to be
explored as a market option and tourism
positioning in the years to come. Sikkim will
have its own airport by 2012.
The third challenge is that Sikkim
cannot grow in isolation. The region
adjoining us also has to prosper in equal
measure. For this to happen, the tussle
between the Darjeeling political movement
for autonomy and the West Bengal
Government has to be sorted out amicably.
The problem which is simmering is having
a huge negative impact in the region as a
whole.
The fourth challenge is about the
Nathula Pass and how to make commercial
sense of it all. This is where there are
different schools of thought. There is the
perception of security and how does India
trade with our neighbour. The question of
Tibet is always a ticklish one. Then there
are issues of scaling up the items and having
movement of people for tourism. The final
thought in this is, of course, are the people
of Sikkim ready? There is great concern on
all fronts and so Government of Sikkim is
indeed taking a cautious approach.
However, in the future this pass will be one
which will perhaps change Sikkim forever.
The fifth challenge is to achieve a major
breakthrough in the quality of delivery and
access of education and health. The
Government and the Planning Commission
is seized of this all important issue facing
the delivery system of Government.
Governance will have to take this up with
greater focus in the next five years. One
of the ways to deliver greater coverage for
health is to usher in Universal Financial
Inclusion, for the entire population of the
State using hitherto unavailable
Population Foundation of India |32
|
|
4.2 Page 32 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
33|Population Foundation of India
|
|
4.3 Page 33 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
technologies. This would enable bank
accounts to be opened up for every
household. This would be very useful for
cutting down on middlemen for delivering
pensions and payments for NREG Scheme.
Furthermore, all families would be linked
to some form of health and life insurance
as well. There is also the issue of ensuring
that the civil society plays a constructive
role in the furthering quality
transformation that is required in all
spheres of social development. There are
high hopes that this will be possible but the
key would be to deliver high quality
primary education. Moreover, making
enough opportunities available for the
youth of Sikkim to be able to come back
and contribute to the growth and
development of the State is a must.
Finally, there is the greatest challenge
of fiscal transformation. From a dependent
State on Central funds and grants to that
of being independent on a fiscal basis would
be possible by 2015. Till then the Centre has
to prime the pump. Sikkim would be able
to harness enough of Hydro Power as well
as make other fiscal arrangements to be able
to pay for its development agenda on a
sustainable basis.
Population Foundation of India |34
|
|
4.4 Page 34 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
35|Population Foundation of India
|
|
4.5 Page 35 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Chhattisgarh State Map Showing Districts
Map not to scale
Population Foundation of India |36
|
|
4.6 Page 36 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Achievements of Chhattisgarh during
the Last Decade
T. Sundararaman*K.R. Antony**V.R. Raman***
Introduction and Summary
Chhattisgarh is among the newest
states of India, formed on 1st
November 2000, by carving it out
from the then Madhya Pradesh State.
Throughout these seven years the state’s
health sector has recorded very good
improvements, though, given the base-lines
with which it started up, it has still a long
way to go to catch up to national averages
on most parameters. One of the major
contributors to this advance were the health
sector reforms in the state that led to a
significant increase in public health
expenditure, that improved the delivery
of quality health services and in improving
the public health infrastructure and above
all that increased community awareness
and support for health programmes.
Of the various health outcome
indicators, only Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
and death rates are measurable and reliable
on an annual basis and these showed
significant declines in rural areas- though
they remained relatively unchanged in
urban areas where these reform measures
had not reached. In 2003, the Rural IMR
was as poor as 77 per 1000 live births
* Executive Director, National Health System Resource Centre, New Delhi** Director, State Health Resource Centre, Chhattisgarh
*** Faculty, State Health Resource Centre , Chhattisgarh
37|Population Foundation of India
|
|
4.7 Page 37 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Population Foundation of India |38
|
|
4.8 Page 38 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
whereas presently it is 62 which is equal
to the national average.
Table-1: Mortality Trends in Chhattisgarh
Indicators
Infant Mortality Rate( Total)
Infant Mortality Rate( Rural)
Infant Mortality Rate (Urban)
Crude Death Rate( Total)
Crude Death Rate (Rural)
Crude Death Rate (Urban)
Chhattisgarh
2003 2007
79
61
95
62
49
50
8.5
8.1
9.1
8.5
7.1
6.3
Source: SRS, GoI
On service delivery indicators the most
reliable are the National Family Health
Survey (NFHS) data and a comparison
between the NFHS-2 done in 1998-99 (the
figures for Chhattisgarh were pulled out of
Madhya Pradesh sample and were sufficient
for the purpose) and the NFHS-3, done in
2005-06, further supports such a trend.
Thus complete immunisation rates more
than doubled (from 21.8% to 48.7% ),
children getting all three polio vaccines rose
from 57% to 85% and antenatal coverage
went up also from 57 % to 89%. The other
parameter that correlates closely to
39|Population Foundation of India
declining IMR was the community level
achievement in breastfeeding. In all aspects
of breast feeding – in colostrum feeding, in
early initiation of breastfeeding and in
exclusive breastfeeding, the state is now
well above national averages. Both NFHS-
3 and District Level Household Survey
(DLHS) and the independent coverage
evaluation survey done by UNICEF bears
this out. DLHS- 3 not only confirms these
general trends but shows further steep
gains in some areas. For example, children
receiving measles vaccine went up from
21.1% in 2002-03 to 79.9% in 2007-08. This
outcome was a result of comprehensive
community level health education drives
that the state government was able to gear
up through various measures like folk art
based communication programmes followed
up together by health department staff and
the central role played by the Mitanin.
Also malnutrition made a modest
decline, much less than the improvement
in service parameters. More important
child malnutrition still remains
|
|
4.9 Page 39 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Comparison of Key trends under NFHS-2 and NFHS-3
Population Foundation of India |40
|
|
4.10 Page 40 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
impermissibly high with over 52% of
children below 3 years being malnourished.
Though this improvement, reflects a much
better inter departmental coordination
and better access to services, the challenge
of addressing the social determinants of
such high malnutrition and a much more
effective outreach to these children remain.
Improvement in Contraception
prevalence rate was also good, but not good
enough to contain the birth rate, which is
now at 26.9. Much of the problem is in access
to services as unmet needs remain at a high
20.9% (DLHS-3).
41|Population Foundation of India
NFHS-2
NFHS-3
|
|
5 Pages 41-50 |
▲back to top |
|
|
5.1 Page 41 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Population Foundation of India |42
|
|
5.2 Page 42 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Apart from above, the state was able
to record major achievements in disease
control - like:
• YAWS- Disease of the underdeveloped
areas- has been eliminated from the
state and it is marching towards
eradication. There were 15 identified
cases of YAWS in the state in 2003,
whereas within a year, this was brought
down to zero. The Chhattisgarh efforts
on this has been highly appreciated by
World Health Organisation (WHO) and
our officials are now been invited to
support the YAWS operations in
countries like Indonesia.
• The Polio scene has also been controlled
very well during this period. During the
initial days of the state, a threat of polio
was prevalent as some cases were
reported in the state during that time.
With effective surveillance systems,
management and immunisation
initiatives, the disease has been
prevented as much as possible and “no
case” has been reported till date.
43|Population Foundation of India
• Leprosy is another disease which is
reaching the elimination stage. In 2003,
the prevalence rate was 7.20 per 10000
populations which have been brought
down to 1.99 through persistent efforts.
In 6 out of 16 districts national goal of
less than 1 prevalence rate has been
achieved and the remaining districts are
moving quickly to achieve this. Though
better case detection criteria would
probably show a higher prevalence,
there is no denying an overall decrease
and an almost complete absence of new
leprosy caused deformities.
• In TB control, Malaria control and in
HIV/AIDS the programmes inch
forward. The TB control programme,
is now extended to all districts. In
Malaria control, the major achievement
the Annual Parasite Incidence
(API), which was 10.6 in 2003, has been
brought down to 5.6, and epidemics with
deaths which were almost an annual
feature in the past are much less now.
Still, three of the southern districts
|
|
5.3 Page 43 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Population Foundation of India |44
|
|
5.4 Page 44 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
where API is high are critical.
Blindness control too has done well
and the performance is comparable to
the best amongst the states.
• A special programme to control Sickle
Cell Anaemia, a specific disease
prevalent in the state is also being run.
Operational research, mass screening
and counselling as well as other
measures initiated where support from
Red Cross society is also availed.
• One of the areas where the state has
been most challenged and constrained
is in the improvement of institutional
deliveries under the Janani Suraksha
Yojana (JSY). The institutional
delivery level has stagnated at about
16% and this is reflective of the
constraints the state is facing with
facility based secondary services. With
the improvement in facilities and
human resource becoming available
within a year of two, even these
parameters should start showing
considerable improvement.
45|Population Foundation of India
Innovations that have contributed to
Chhattisgarh’s achievements.
When the achievement of Chhattisgarh
are judged, they need to be seen against a
baseline. At the time of its formation about
40% of the sanctioned posts were vacant.
And each facility had less than one thirds
of the staff it should have by Indian Public
Health Standard (IPHS) recommendations
and further almost one fifth of sub-centers,
one third of Public Health Centres (PHCs)
were not created at all. Indeed the lack of
infrastructure and development was one of
the reasons for creating a new state. The
new state had also got to create its own
institutional framework for management
and training of health staff and expand its
educational capacities.
That the state was able to do all this was
largely due to innovative and indigenous
planning efforts linked to a wide variety of
partnerships and trust in community
processes. Not all innovations and efforts
have given immediate results and especially
in improved service delivery in facilities the
|
|
5.5 Page 45 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Population Foundation of India |46
|
|
5.6 Page 46 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
states efforts must be strengthened and
sustained for one year before its impact
would be measurable. We describe below
some of the key innovations- many of which
we note are today mainstreamed into the
National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) at
the national level. Indeed the focus on
strengthening public health systems as the
centre-piece of health sector reform,
relegating public private partnerships to a
supplementary role, a major feature of the
NRHM, was the approach that
Chhattisgarh took at a time when that had
not yet become the major framework of
reform.
• Optimising the Community Level
Measures- The Mitanin Programme:
The Mitanin Scheme of community
health volunteers, which began with
much hesitation and teething troubles
has grown over the last few years into a
state level programme which serves as
an inspiration and an example for the
entire country. Today about 60000
Mitanins or voluntary health activists
47|Population Foundation of India
are giving their voluntary services in
every hamlet and in every nook and
corner of the state. They have undergone
10 rounds of trainings including one on
essential new born care and an
integrated management of the sick
neonate and child. They provide first
level curative care using drugs provided
as part of Mukhyamantri Dawa Peti
Scheme. Learnings from the Mitanin
Scheme have had a major influence on
the design of ASHA (Accredited Social
Health Activist) scheme under the
National Rural Health Mission
launched by Government of India. There
are seven important ways in which the
Mitanin programme differed with
earlier large scale community health
worker programmes organised by the
government. Firstly – all the Mitanins
are women. Secondly the area of
coverage was a habitation, which meant
less problem of heterogeneity and more
access and what is most important a
decreased work load making
|
|
5.7 Page 47 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
voluntarism feasible. Thirdly selection
was by the community, but through a
defined process and facilitated by a
trained prerak who not only ensured
that the community made an informed
decision but also articulated the views
of weaker sections. Fourthly, a strategy
where the main motivation was social
recognition and the spirit of service,
where the honorarium in the form of
incentives for specific tasks, didn’t
become central to her work. Fifth,
training was considered and recurrent
and continued activity for the entire
duration of the programme and not just
an initiating event. Sixth and what was
important was a full time dedicated,
specifically trained cadre of trainer-
facilitators who provided not only
training, but also monitoring and much
needed on the job support. And finally
management of the programme through
state civil society partnerships at every
level. The precise contribution that this
programme made to, the visible
improvement in so many health
outcomes and service delivery
outcomes, as disaggregated from other
changes happening in this period, will
forever remain difficult to determine.
However, undeniably, five years after
its initiation the attendance at each
round of training continues to be
undiminished, Mitanins in the vast
majority of hamlets continue to make
modest daily contributions to better
community health with undiminished
enthusiasm, and tens of thousands of
women have become empowered to
articulate a variety of health and
related issues. These are in itself
reasons for optimism and hope and the
programme has become a flagship for
health sector reform, drawing not only
local leaders to attend to health issues,
but also finance departments to
sanction more funds for the health
sector..
Population Foundation of India |48
|
|
5.8 Page 48 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
49|Population Foundation of India
|
|
5.9 Page 49 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
• Improving Performance of the
Hospitals: The Jeevan Deep
Approach: In order to improve the
quality of management of the
government run hospitals and to
change the perceptions of general
community about the poor quality of
services in government hospitals, a
pioneering hospital reform scheme
called the Jeevan Deep Scheme has
been put in place in the state. Under
this novel scheme a more responsive,
more representative, more people
oriented and more target centric
hospital management committees
called Jeevan Deep Samitis have been
created for every level of government
hospitals up to the PHC. These
committees will also have the power
to recommend disciplinary action
against non-performing officials.
Under this scheme, every hospital in
the state will be graded on the basis of
its service quality and best hospitals
will be given Jeevan Deep gold stars,
silver stars and bronze stars
respectively. The best hospital in every
district will get Rs. 2 lacs as reward
for good services. Chhattisgarh is the
pioneer state to have launched such a
peoples friendly target oriented scheme.
It will be a marked departure from the
old Rogi Kalyan Samitis which were
running the hospitals earlier. Korba,
Ambikapur and Durg are Silver Star
hospitals. The Korba District Hospital
has been since through a further process
of quality improvement been certified for
ISO 9001:2000- one of the very few
public hospitals in India to have been
so certified.
• Developing FRU facilities and
bridging specialist gaps: the Equip
Initiative: In terms of closing the gaps
in infrastructure, skilled manpower and
equipment in parallel to addressing
quality and adequacy of utilization of
services, a new block by block approach
has been adopted by the state. This
approach goes by the acronym “EQUIP”-
Population Foundation of India |50
|
|
5.10 Page 50 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Enhancing Quality in Primary health
care- and it focuses on reduction of
maternal mortality as the quality index
around which health services are
rationalized. 32 blocks each has been
taken up in the first two years and the
entire state is planned to be covered in
another 3 years. So as to address the
specialist gaps, an innovative training
programme for multiskilling doctors,
particularly in Emergency Obstetric
Care (EmoC) and Anaesthesia, has been
designed which has been replicated
nationally now. These trainings are
conducted in 3 top medical institutions
of the state and so far 96 MBBS doctors
has been built capacities to impart
EMoC services as well as anaesthesia.
However only about 25% of this
converted into functional First Referral
Units (FRUs), due to various operational
constraints. Despite this, the number of
FRUs rose sharply and way forward on
this difficult goal became clear. Training
on essential neonatal care and some
51|Population Foundation of India
other disciplines are also started very
recently. This way the FRU service
provision has been marked a much
better status in the state if compared
to past- We would like to note that
these facilities are now becoming
available even in some of those
facilities situated in conflict-ridden
areas of the state.
• Placing Health into Panchayats
Agenda- The Swasth Panchayat
Scheme: This is a programme to
support local health planning and to
enhance Panchyat Raj Institutions (PRI)
role in health. An indicator based health
& human development index has been
prepared for all Panchayats of the state
which is hamlet centred so as to capture
even the intra-panchayat variations. At
present, the HHDI is ready for 9141
Panchayats out of 9820 Panchayats in
the state. Honble Chief Minister of the
state has declared an award for two top
Panchayats of each block based on this
index and also provisions are made to
|
|
6 Pages 51-60 |
▲back to top |
|
|
6.1 Page 51 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
support weaker Panchayats identified
under this process. The Programme is
now in the second year of
implementation. This programme builds
on the community mobilisation initiated
by the Mitanin programme and takes it
forward into village level comprehensive
health planning.
• Reaching out to the people in every
corner- The Mobile Medical Units:
Chhattisgarh is a tribal state where 44
% of the area is covered with forests.
Reaching out to the far-flung corners of
the state for providing health services
is major challenge. In order to overcome
this challenge and to provide
uninterrupted health services in tribal
blocks, as many as 74 mobile medical
units have been operationalised in the
state. They are providing valuable
services in the haat baazars of tribal
blocks in the state.
• An innovative institutional model has
been set up in the form of state-civil
society joint initiative, the State Health
Resource Centre (SHRC) to shape
the reform processes and to initiate
them wherever it is necessary. The
important innovation is not only that
it is partnership between government
and civil society, but also that it has
built a model of technical assistance
which is based on indigenous technical
strengths, largely operates within a
government financial rules and what
is most important is based upon
institutional capacity building and not
on external consultancy alone. Though
this has been one of the earliest
innovations picked up for replication,
similar SHRCs have been slow to
emerge, and in retrospect one begins
to appreciate the level of innovation
and change that setting this up
required.
Core Improvements:
Other than these major innovations,
there are various “reform” milestones set
by the NRHM that have been achieved by
Population Foundation of India |52
|
|
6.2 Page 52 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
53|Population Foundation of India
|
|
6.3 Page 53 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
this state as well. These are not innovations-
in that they represent well known, almost
routine measures of a functional health
department. Yet it is often the
implementation of these core measures that
would have the maximum impact. We list a
few of these below:
• Formation of State Health Mission
and Driving towards the NRHM
Goals: Moving towards health for the
poor, a state health mission has been
constituted under NRHM, Chaired by
the Hon. Chief Minister. State and
District and Block programme
Management Units are supporting the
mission activities at respective levels.
Decentralised planning and
management of resources to address
local needs has become a reality.
• Major Infrastructure Expansion:
The inadequacy in number of facilities
has been met during this period by
sanctioning health facilities: apart from
district hospitals sanctioned and in most
cases built new for all districts, 17 new
Community Health Centres(CHCs), 200
new Primary Health Centres and 874
new sub centres have been sanctioned.
By this, the state has achieved
population norms for creation of
facilities except in the case of CHCs. In
terms of filling the building gaps, 26
CHCs, 39 PHCs and 201 sub centre
buildings are under construction-
though the vast majority of sub-centres
still need to be provided with a building.
During the last 3 years, Rs 20 lacs per
block allocations are made under
various schemes for refurbishment of
available buildings in all 146 blocks.
Under the ongoing European Union
State Partnership, infrastructure
development is a major focus.
• Creation of the State Institute of
Health & Family Welfare(SIHFW):
A Human Resource Development policy
for health has been adopted and SIHFW
has been created to take forward the
implementation of this policy. A state
of the art building for SIHFW has been
Population Foundation of India |54
|
|
6.4 Page 54 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
55|Population Foundation of India
|
|
6.5 Page 55 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
completed and the institution has given
adequate manpower and logistical
support in terms of achieving its goals.
It is aimed that the capacity and
motivation gaps among the field force
be addressed through systematic
planning and implementation of
training programmes initiated by
SIHFW.
• Sanction of staff setup for the
health department: A revised
administrative set up was adopted in
2006 under which adequate number of
posts was sanctioned in every health
facility. Though still short of the IPHS
norms, for Chhattisgarh it was a major
step forward. .
• Recruitment of Medical officers: For
the first time after the state formation,
and almost after a period of 15 years,
449 doctors were appointed through
Public Service Commission, and of these
250 of them have joined the services. In
addition AYUSH doctors have been used
to fill up medical officer posts in over
150 primary health centres. Rural
posting of medical graduates as a
mandatory condition of consideration for
post graduation has also led to over 150
doctors becoming every year on a
contractual basis. In addition to all of
this all districts are empowered to fill
up vacancies on a contractual basis. To
expand the pool of medical officers
available for recruitment, two more
medical colleges, one in 2002 in
Bilaspur, and another in 2007 in
Jagdalpur have been added to the
existing medical college at Raipur. More
colleges are planned. In order to meet
the doctor deficiency, as an immediate
measure the state has pooled 398 “rural
medical assistants” in PHCs from the
ongoing 3 year medical course.
• Mainstreaming of Indian Systems of
Medicine: The Indian Systems of
Medicine has been given top priority by
the state. The Raipur Ayurveda College
has been developed into a model college
and then as a University. Drug testing
Population Foundation of India |56
|
|
6.6 Page 56 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
facilities, for ayurvedic drugs are now
available. Panchakarma therapy centres
and speciality clinics has been started
in a number of Allopathic health
facilities so as to provide choice between
systems for the community in chronic
illness. As many as 86 Primary Health
Centres and Ayurvedic Dispenseries
have been merged. And all 60000
Mitanins are being trained on household
herbal remedies
• Control of Food & Drugs: A state of
the art Drug Testing Laboratory is
ready for inauguration at Raipur city
until now it was necessary to sent food/
drug samples to external laboratories
for getting the sample tests done. In
addition to this, mobile laboratories
have been made operational in order
to make collecting samples from
remote and village areas possible.
Smoking and tobacco use has been
banned in public places.
Emerging Policies and Initiatives:
After an extensive process of discussion
with a wide variety of stakeholders, the
State Health & Population Policy has been
prepared and this shall be notified soon. A
new act for regulation of clinical
establishments under private sector is
drafted and awaiting approval. There is a
major plan being put in place to rapidly
increase nursing education and nurse
availability within the system. A Bal
Hruday Suraksha Yojna (literally meaning
Child Heart Protection Scheme) is proposed
as a special school health programme to help
poor children with congenital cardiac
diseases. A state wide urban health
programme and a scheme for building
dharamsalas in every government hospital
are also being rolled out. 5000 telephone
connections through BSNL to connect all
Sub Centres, PHCs, CHCs and district
hospitals are under installation and an
emergency ambulance system is under
consideration.
57|Population Foundation of India
|
|
6.7 Page 57 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
A Comparative Chart on Health-Showing Growth on Various
Health Sector Reform Areas
AREA
STATUS 2003
STATUS 2008
PURPOSE/ACHIEVEMENT
Policies and Programmes
Health and Population Policy
Nil
Finalised, awaiting approval
Policy Governance
HRD Policy
Nil
Notified
Planned HR Development
Drug Policy
Nil
Finalised, awaiting approval
Towards rational drug use
Policy for Medically Underserved Areas
Nil
Under Preparation
Reaching the unreached
Delegation and decentralisation of powers
Upto District
Upto Block
Grassroots governance
Mainstreaming of AYUSH
Not done
Achieved
Holistic approach
YAWS Control (No. of cases)
15
0
Towards Elimination
Polio Control (No. of cases)
2
0
Towards elimination
Leprosy Control (Prevalence Rate)
7.2
1.99
72.36 % reduction
TB Control (District Covered)
4
16
100 % coverage
Mitanin Programme (No. of Mitanins)
Nil
60092
100 % coverage of rural areas
Medical Facilities in Public Sector
No. of Medical Colleges
2
3
1
No. of District Hospitals
9
15
6
No. of 100 bedded Civil Hospitals
8
16
8
No. of Community Health Centres
114
129
15
No. of Functional First Referral Units
0
64
64
No. of Primary Health Centres
512
727
215
No. of Primary Health Sub centres
3818
4728
910
Manpower
No. of Posts sanctioned of medical officers
1455
1737
282
Population Foundation of India |58
|
|
6.8 Page 58 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Contd. ....
AREA
No. of Posts sanctioned of Specialists
No. Doctors promoted as specialists
Doctors sanctioned for a PHC
Doctors sanctioned for CHC
Selection of Doctors through PSC
Completion of Buildings
New District hospital
New CHCs
New PHCs
New Sub centres
Fund Allocations
Budget outlay for Health Department
Assistance Under Sanjeevni Kosh
External Assistance Mobilised
Inpatient dietary allocations per head
Additional Untied Funds per District Hospital pa
Additional Untied Funds per CHC pa
Additional Untied Funds per PHC pa
Additional Untied funds per Sub centre
STATUS 2003
247
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
235.23 crores
2.49 crores
Less than 50 crores
8.00 Rs
0
0
0
0
STATUS 2008
637
250
2
8
448
6
36
73
203
485.7 crores
13.29 crores
More than 300 crores
16.00 Rs
5.0 lacs
2.0 lacs
0.5 lacs
0.18 lacs
PURPOSE/ACHIEVEMENT
390
250
2 times
2 times
448
6
36
73
203
Almost 2 times
Almost 5 times
Almost 3 times
2 times hike
5.0 lacs for 16 facilities
2.0 lacs for 117 facilities
0.5 lacs for 517 facilities
0.18 lacs for 4692 facilities
59|Population Foundation of India
|
|
6.9 Page 59 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Indicators, Indices and Ranking of
States for the
4th JRD Tata Memorial Awards
Population Foundation of India |60
|
|
6.10 Page 60 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Table 1: Inputs for Base Year in the States of India
Census,
1991
NFHS II NFHS II
NFHS II NFHS II
State
Sex Ratio
(0-6)-1991
Women
(20-24)
married
by age 18
CPR any
methods
Full
Immuni-
zation
TFR
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir**
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Maximum
Minimum
975
982
975
953
984
915
964
928
879
951
917
979
960
958
941
946
974
986
969
993
967
875
916
965
948
967
927
949
967
1000
700
64.3
27.6
40.7
71.9
61.3
19.8
10.1
40.7
41.5
10.7
22.1
64.1
46.3
17.0
64.0
47.7
9.9
25.5
11.6
22.9
37.6
11.6
68.3
22.3
24.9
37.7
64.3
25.9
45.9
100.0
0
59.6
35.4
43.3
23.5
45.0
63.8
47.5
59.0
62.4
67.7
49.1
27.6
58.3
63.7
44.1
60.9
38.7
20.2
57.7
30.3
46.8
66.7
40.3
53.8
52.1
55.5
27.3
43.1
66.6
100.0
0
58.7
2.3
20.5
2.5
17.0
2.3
12.5
3.7
20.0
2.8
69.8
2.4
82.6
1.8
53.0
2.7
62.7
2.9
83.4
2.1
56.7
2.7
6.5
2.8
60.0
2.1
79.7
2.0
23.2
3.5
78.4
2.5
42.3
3.0
14.3
4.6
59.6
2.9
14.1
3.8
43.7
2.5
72.1
2.2
17.3
3.8
47.4
2.8
88.8
2.2
40.7
1.9
20.5
4.1
34.6
2.6
43.8
2.3
100.0
6
0
2.1
*IMR for 1998, SRS Bulletin, April 2000
**1991 census figures=(2001-1981)/2+1981
NFHS II
Atleast
three
ANC
Visits
80.1
40.5
30.8
15.6
33.2
68.2
95.7
60.2
37.4
60.9
66.0
24.5
71.4
98.3
26.3
65.4
54.4
31.3
75.8
23.1
47.3
57.0
22.9
42.6
91.4
47.2
14.7
19.7
57.0
100.0
0
NFHS II
NFHS II
SRS
Census,
1991
Census, Census,
1991
1991
Safe
Delivery
65.2
31.9
21.4
25.3
32.3
65.9
90.8
53.5
42.0
40.2
42.4
17.5
59.1
94.0
28.8
59.4
53.9
20.6
67.5
32.8
33.4
62.6
35.8
35.1
83.8
47.5
21.8
34.6
44.2
100.0
0
% Children *IMR,
Underweight 1999
37.7
24.3
36.0
54.4
60.8
34.7
28.6
45.1
34.6
43.6
34.5
54.3
43.9
26.9
53.1
49.6
27.5
37.9
27.7
24.1
54.4
28.7
50.6
20.6
36.7
42.6
52.2
41.8
48.7
100.0
0
66
35
76
63
78
25
17
63
68
54
45
71
58
15
90
48
23
61
14
32
97
53
81
46
52
27
84
52
52
150.0
5
Girl
school
attendance
rate (6-14),
1991
46.1
40.6
48.7
29.1
43.5
76.3
84.3
58.0
58.6
75.0
46.4
34.2
56.1
91.9
41.6
66.5
54.9
42.6
68.2
54.4
47.4
65.4
27.7
62.0
71.1
56.6
30.4
55.2
47.3
100.0
0
Female
Youth
(15-24)
Literacy
41.0
42.4
52.9
28.3
35.5
75.0
85.7
58.4
50.5
72.3
43.7
30.1
54.8
96.8
35.8
67.0
62.2
56.9
87.2
70.0
45.5
66.5
25.9
61.7
63.9
62.4
31.6
55.9
56.1
100.0
0
Literacy
Rate(7+)
44.1
41.6
52.9
37.5
42.9
75.3
75.5
61.3
55.8
63.9
44.1
41.4
56.0
89.8
44.7
64.9
59.9
49.1
82.3
61.6
49.1
58.5
38.6
56.9
62.7
60.4
40.7
57.8
57.7
100.0
0
National
Human
Development
Report,2001
% of Plan
Expenditure
on Social
Sector,
1997-98
22.46
29.65
45.89
17.26
32.74
51.9
42.83
22.97
34.26
35.24
28.86
17.26
32.31
18.88
32.74
20.69
32.44
37.83
30.35
36.73
32.38
20.67
24.22
45.38
38.89
43.18
29.6
29.6
22.83
100
0
61|Population Foundation of India
|
|
7 Pages 61-70 |
▲back to top |
|
|
7.1 Page 61 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
State
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhan d
West Bengal
Maximum
Minimum
Table 2: Input for the Final Year in the States of India
Census, NFHS III NFHS III NFHS III NFHS III NFHS III NFHS III
2001
NFHS III
SRS
Under Five Mortality
Rate,
Census, 2001
Census,
2001
Census, Census,
2001
2001
Statistical
Abstract,
India,2001
Sex Ratio Women
(0-6) (20-24)
married
by
age 18
CPR
Full
any Immuni-
methods zation
TFR,
961 54.7
67.6 46.0 1.8
964 40.6
43.2 28.4 3.0
965 38.0
56.5 31.4 2.4
942 60.3
34.1 32.8 4.0
975 51.8
53.2
48.7
2.6
868 21.2
66.9 63.2 2.1
938 11.7
48.2 78.6 1.8
883 33.5
66.6
45.2
2.4
819 39.8
63.4 65.3 2.7
896 12.3
72.6 74.2 1.9
941 14.0
52.6 66.7 2.4
965 61.2
35.7 34.2 3.3
946 41.2
63.6 55.0 2.1
960 15.4
68.6 75.3 1.9
932 53.0
55.9 40.3 3.1
913 38.8
66.9 58.8 2.1
957 12.7
48.7 46.8 2.8
973 24.5
24.3 32.9 3.8
964 20.6
59.9 46.5 2.9
964 21.1
29.7 21.0 3.7
953 36.3
50.7 51.8 2.4
798 19.4
63.3 60.1 2.0
909 57.1
47.2
26.5
3.2
963 30.1
57.6 69.6 2.0
942 21.5
61.4 80.9 1.8
966 41.0
65.7 49.7 2.2
916 53.0
43.6 23.0 3.8
908 22.6
59.3 60.0 2.6
960 53.3
71.2 64.3 2.3
1000 100
100
100
6
700
0
0
0
2.1
Atleast
three
ANC
Visits
Safe
%
IMR,
Delivery Children 2005
Underweight
85.4 74.9
35.5 30.2
39.3 31.0
17.0 29.3
54.2 41.6
75.1 64.1
94.9 94.0
67.5
63.0
59.2 48.9
62.6 47.8
73.5 56.5
35.9 27.8
79.5 69.7
93.6 99.4
40.7
32.7
75.1 68.7
68.6 59.0
54.0
31.1
59.3 65.4
32.7 24.7
61.8 44.0
74.8 68.2
41.2 41.0
70.1 53.7
95.9 90.6
60.0 48.8
26.6 27.2
44.9 38.5
62.0 47.6
100
100
0
0
32.5
57
32.5
37
36.4
68
55.9
61
47.1
63
26.1
35
25.0
16
44.6
54
39.6
60
36.5
49
25.6
50
56.5
50
37.6
50
22.9
14
60.0
76
37.0
36
22.1
13
48.8
49
19.9
20
25.2
18
40.7
75
24.9
44
39.9
68
19.7
30
29.8
37
39.6
31
42.4
73
38.0
42
38.7
38
100
150
0
5
M/F
Ratio
1.09
1.03
1.05
0.88
1.07
0.96
0.98
0.99
0.89
1.09
0.96
0.98
1.06
0.87
0.95
1.01
0.96
1.03
1.01
0.83
1.05
0.96
0.92
1.03
0.99
1.01
0.89
1.00
1.02
1
0.83
M/F
Girl
Ratio
school
(Truncated attendance
at 1)
rate
(6-14 yrs)
1.0
74.3
1.0
56.7
1.0
62.5
0.9
40.6
1.0
69.9
1.0
83.4
1.0
89.4
1.0
71.4
0.9
75.7
1.0
90.5
1.0
60.3
1.0
51.2
1.0
74.2
0.9
95.1
1.0
65.7
1.0
84.7
1.0
77.9
1.0
60.3
1.0
81.2
0.8
70.0
1.0
64.9
1.0
79.4
0.9
60.9
1.0
81.2
1.0
86.9
1.0
75.0
0.9
57.8
1.0
80.0
1.0
69.3
1
100
0.83
0
Female
Youth
(15-24)
Literacy
Rate
64.7
61.6
68.1
42.8
68.8
85.2
91.0
72.4
75.3
89.3
57.4
50.3
73.7
98.1
62.6
84.9
79.5
74.0
92.6
73.3
66.3
81.1
54.9
79.8
84.2
78.7
53.2
78.1
70.8
100
0
Literacy
Rate(7+)
60.5
54.3
63.3
47.0
64.7
81.7
82.0
69.1
67.9
76.5
55.5
53.6
66.6
90.9
63.7
76.9
70.5
62.6
88.8
66.6
63.1
69.7
60.4
68.8
73.5
73.2
56.3
71.6
68.6
100
0
% of Plan
Expenditure
on Social
Sector,
2004-05
30.0
31.6
32.5
33.3
39.9
50.6
43.2
37.3
44.1
46.9
29.7
29.2
29.6
22.3
30.3
44.7
36.2
38.0
28.1
33.6
29.0
25.4
31.4
40.9
46.5
44.3
30.6
41.4
36.0
100
0
Population Foundation of India |62
|
|
7.2 Page 62 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
State
Chhatisgarh
Sikkim
Uttarakhand
Rajasthan
Manipur
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Jammu & Kashmir
West Bengal
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Karnataka
Meghalaya
Jharkhand
Kerala
Tripura
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
Assam
Goa
Haryana
Punjab
Mizoram
Delhi
Bihar
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Table 3: Index Values for Base and Final Years and Ranking
Composite Rank of
index, NFHS III
NFHS III
61.8
19
73.5
5
66.4
15
51.0
26
70.7
9
68.9
11
78.6
3
66.0
16
67.2
14
71.6
8
53.3
24
62.0
18
69.8
10
57.7
22
50.8
27
79.1
2
68.3
12
65.2
17
44.6
28
72.5
6
59.6
20
80.4
1
58.6
21
67.8
13
74.0
4
71.6
7
40.9
29
52.4
25
57.0
23
Composite
index (U5
excluded),
NFHS III
58.9
71.5
63.8
50.8
70.3
66.5
77.5
65.2
64.7
69.4
52.0
59.1
67.5
54.4
48.0
83.3
65.9
62.9
45.3
70.3
56.4
79.8
60.4
67.2
72.0
71.3
41.8
56.4
53.7
Composite
index,
NFHS II
45.4
61.9
53.8
37.7
62.8
58.5
72.2
57.7
57.9
63.6
42.0
51.5
62.1
46.4
39.3
82.2
62.1
58.5
36.2
68.7
51.8
80.5
55.7
65.5
73.3
72.4
35.8
54.8
53.3
Rank of Change
NFHS II (NFHSIII-II)
24
13.5
12
9.6
19
9.9
27
13.1
9
7.5
13
7.9
5
5.2
16
7.5
15
6.8
8
5.7
25
9.9
22
7.6
10
5.4
23
8.1
26
8.6
1
1.1
11
3.8
14
4.4
28
9.1
6
1.6
21
4.6
2
-0.7
17
4.7
7
1.7
3
-1.3
4
-1.2
29
5.9
18
1.6
20
0.4
Rank 4*Change Rank of 4* Final Index
Change
Change
(NFHS III-II)
(NFHS III-II)
1
54.0
1
115.8
5
38.3
5
111.8
3
39.7
3
106.1
2
52.5
2
103.5
11
30.0
11
100.8
9
31.8
9
100.6
17
21.0
17
99.6
12
30.0
12
95.9
13
27.4
13
94.6
15
23.0
15
94.5
4
39.7
4
93.0
10
30.3
10
92.4
16
21.5
16
91.3
8
32.3
8
90.0
7
34.6
7
85.4
25
4.5
25
83.6
21
15.2
21
83.5
20
17.7
20
82.9
6
36.5
6
81.1
23
6.5
23
79.0
19
18.5
19
78.0
27
-2.8
27
77.6
18
19.0
18
77.6
22
6.6
22
74.5
29
-5.3
29
68.7
28
-4.6
28
67.0
14
23.8
14
64.7
24
6.5
24
58.9
26
1.7
26
58.7
Final Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
63|Population Foundation of India
|
|
7.3 Page 63 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
Table 4: Ranking of States on Reproductive and Child Health Programmes in India
Bigger States
S.No. States
1. Chhattisgarh
2. Rajasthan
3. Andhra Pradesh
4. Tamil Nadu
5. Jammu & Kashmir
6. West Bengal
7. Maharashtra
8. Madhya Pradesh
9. Orissa
10. Karnataka
11. Jharkhand
12. Kerala
13. Gujarat
14. Uttar Pradesh
15. Assam
16. Haryana
17. Punjab
18. Delhi
19 Bihar
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Smaller States
States
Sikkim
Uttarakhand
Manipur
Meghalaya
Tripura
Himachal Pradesh
Goa
Mizoram
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Population Foundation of India |64
|
|
7.4 Page 64 |
▲back to top |
JRD TATA MEMORIAL AWARD FOR POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROGRAMMES 2008
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Government of India, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, (2002).
Statistical Abstract, India 2001. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation.
2. Government of India, Planning Commission, (2002). National Human Development
Report 2001. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3. IIPS and Macro-International, (2007). India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-
3). India. Vol.1. 2005-06.Mumbai: IIPS.
4. IIPS and ORC Macro, (2001a). India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2).1998-
99.Mumbai: IIPS.
5. India, Registrar General, (1997). Fertility Tables Part VI- F Series. Census of India
1991. Series 1- India, States and Union Territories. Delhi: Registrar General and
Census Commissioner.
6. India, Registrar General, (2004). Primary Census Abstract. Total Population. Table
A-5. Census of India 2001. India. Delhi: Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
7. India, Registrar General, (2002). Sample Registration System Statistical Report
1999. Delhi: Controller of Publication.
8. India, Registrar General, (2006a). Sample Registration System Statistical Report
2005. Report No.2 of 2006. Delhi: Controller of Publication.
65|Population Foundation of India
|
|
7.5 Page 65 |
▲back to top |
Vision -
“ Promoting, Fostering and Inspiring sustainable and balanced human development with a focus on
population stabilization through an enabling environment for an ascending quality of life with equity
and justice.”
Mission Statement-
PFI will strive to realize its Vision by promoting and formulating gender sensitive and rights based
population and development policies, strategies and programmes.
To this end, it will
· Collaborate with central, state and local government institutions for effective policy planning,
formulation and facilitation of programme implementation.
· Extend technical and financial support to individuals and civil society institutions and promote
innovative approaches.
· Undertake and support systems, action, translational and other forms of operational research.
· Create awareness and undertake informed advocacy at the community, regional, national and
global levels for socio-cultural and behavioural change.
· Focus on un-served, under-served areas and vulnerable sections of society and address the
challenges of an emerging demographic transition.
· Mobilize financial and human resources from all sources both national and international.
Population Foundation of India
B-28, Qutab Institutional Area, Tara Crescent, New Delhi 110 016
Tel. No : 42899770 , Fax : 42899795
Website : www.popfound.org, E-mail : popfound@sify.com
Designed and Printed by : IMAGE - 9811116841